Class Research Resources and Assignments
Supplementary Material for Week 5 Week's Assigned Readings Slides for Lecture - Week 6 Videos of Week 6 Lectures
The United States federal government owns a considerable amount of land throughout the entire United States. How should this public land be managed? What are the historical patterns of mining, timber and grazing practices on public lands? Many of these practices were put in place over a century ago. Should these practices be reformed? If so, according to what principles should these lands be managed? It is often revealing to examine in what period and in what cultural context the legislation and regulations governing the use of Federal lands in the United States were conceived and first implemented. We might ask, have the circumstances changed to a significant extent since these measures were designed? How should we view the historical context that gave rise to the governing legislation in the perspective of large historical transformations in human history? For a brief discussion of the broad ecological changes in human history see the following brief article (PDF format): |
|||||||
After reading this short article, ask yourself, have Americans learned anything substantive from previous human history about how they ought to manage public lands? If, in your view, existing regulations and customs of usage need to be changed, what moral argument would you make for changing them? On what moral grounds do those who support them defend these governing statutes? |
STEWART UDALL . Friday, April 19,1996 Morning Edition. Former Secretary of the Interior in the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations, about the Mining Law of 1872. Udall says the law is hopelessly outdated because it allows companies to mine for precious metals on federal lands without paying any royalties. (4:54) The Mineral Policy Center - NGO working to reform the 1872 Law. |
|
Mining (NPR, All Things Considered, June 14, 1999). In hearings tomorrow, the US Senate plans to re-examine the Mining Act of 1872, which regulates mining on public land. The most recent controversy over the Act, stemmed from a debate over whether to allow a large open-pit gold mine in Washington State. (5:30) |
|
“The Last American Dinosaur: the 1872 Mining Law” | |
U.S.
Mining |
|
Montana's Rocky Mountains. Thursday, February 4, 1999. Morning Edition. NPR's John Nielsen reports that a pristine area long fought over by developers and environmentalists may be protected from development. The Clinton Administration has called for a ban on mining in the national forests that cover much of Montana's Rocky Mountain Front range -- about 429,000 acres. The National Forest Service says it's the first of a series of protections designed to preserve wilderness areas. Enviromentalists are delighted, but the mining industry says it's the latest in a series of economically damaging bans.(3:33) |
|
Jane
Parlez and Lowell Bergman 2005 "The Cost of Gold | 30 Tons an Ounce: Behind Gold's Glitter: Torn Lands and Pointed Questions," The New York Times, (24 October 2005). |
|
There
has always been an element of madness to gold's allure. |
|
Jane
Parlez and Lowell Bergman 2005 "Tangled Strands in Fight Over Peru Gold Mine," The New York Times, (25 October 2005). |
|
SAN CERILLO, Peru - The Rev. Marco Arana drove his beige pickup over
the curves of a dirt road 13,000 feet high in the Andes. Spread out
below lay the Yanacocha gold mine, an American-run operation of mammoth
open pits and towering heaps of cyanide-laced ore. Ahead loomed the
pristine green of untouched hills. |
|
On Point | |
2005 "The Real Cost of Gold," NPR - WBUR - On Point, (28 October 2005). |
|
Roads in National Forests. June 16, 1998. All Things Considered. NPR'S John Biewen reports on a proposal to put a moratorium on new roadbuilding in the nation's National Forests. The Forest Service doesn't have sufficient funds to maintain the roads that now exist and wants to reevaluate its policy on roads. The timber industry sees the moratorium as part of a process to further reduce the amount of federal forest available for harvest. (6:00) |
U.S.
senators take hard line on lumber dispute Canadian Broadcasting Corporation,21:52:46 - Thursday, Mar 1, 2001 WASHINGTON - A group of U.S. senators is calling on the Bush administration to get tough with Canada over softwood lumber exports. Fifty-one senators have signed a letter to President Bush calling for vigorous efforts to reach a new agreement in the long-standing dispute. "It's time for the United States government to stand behind its producers," said Republican Senator Mike Crapo of Idaho. |
U.S.
imposes penalty on softwood lumber Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, 22:19:12 Fri Aug 10, 2001 WASHINGTON - The U.S. has slapped a hefty penalty on Canadian softwood lumber imports, dealing a bitter blow to the billion-dollar industry. |
Forest Service Employees for Environmental Ethics (FSEEE) |
Livestock Dispute. March 1, 2000. NPR's Howard Berkes reports on the longstanding dispute between ranchers and environmentalists over livestock grazing on federal lands, at the heart of a case the Supreme Court hears today. The Court's ruling will affect about 20- thousand ranchers in 13 western states, who provide about two-percent of the nation's beef. (4:52) |
Supreme Court Decision on Grazing. May 15, 2000. NPR's Howard Berkes reports on today's decision by the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold current federal grazing regulations. Some agricultural groups had challenged some of the Interior Department's decisions, including allowing grazing permits to be issued to people who were not planning to run livestock on the land. (2:30) |
Importance of Public Policy |
||||||
EDITORIAL |
||||||
|
|
|