Class Research Resources and Assignments
Week 11
Land
Management and Public Health
Full
Lecture - Week 11
Assigned
Readings
[NOTA BENE:"Great
Expectations" for Class Presentations]
Water
| Chemicals | Food Supply | Animal
and Wildlife Health
Climate Change and Health | New and Resurgent
Disease | Antibiotic Resistance
Biotechnology-Bioterrorism
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Look forward to the 25th Anniversary discussion of:
|
Scientists who
are aware of the way in which healthy ecosystems function have been
emphasizing that changes in land management practices can have profound
public health implications. In the long run it is widely acknowledged
that the health of human populations rests upon the health of the underlying
ecosystems upon which they depend. Abrupt or even gradual
changes in land management practice over time can lead to the rapid
growth of vector species or the rapid disappearance of keystone species,
causing massive public health crises for humans or their domestic animals. |
Water Supply CLINTON DRINKING WATER ANNOUNCEMENT |
Pervasive
Chemicals in the Environment:
Pesticide
linked to breast cancer Pesticides
'reduce male fertility' Move
to control pesticides
Norway's
androgynous polar bears Brussels
'backing down' on gender benders More
Arctic pollution found
Monday, June 28, 1999 Birth
defect link to landfill sites
POPs Treaty Bush
to sign pollutants treaty
"The President has been dubbed by some as the 'Toxic Texan'" National Environmental Trust's Philip Clapp "America will only co-operate with the world on environmental issues when there is no cost to American companies" The BBC's Paul Reynolds "President Bush made an important occasion out of this announcement" Mr Bush - who has been dogged by criticism for his environmental policies in his first months in office - said the risk posed by organic pollutants was great and action needed to be taken. "We must work to eliminate or at least to severely restrict the release of these toxins without delay," Mr Bush said. |
Food Supply Japan - Mad Cow All Things Considered Friday, November 23, 2001 A second case of mad cow disease was confirmed in Japan earlier this week and the country's agriculture ministry has announced plans to slaughter cattle in an attempt to stem the spread of the disease. Linda Wertheimer talks with Charles Scanlon of the BBC who is stationed in Tokyo. (3:30) Mad Cow Disease Sheep Raid Red Cross - Mad Cow BSE-CJD
In Depth Reports - BBC BSE report
blames government ministers Creutzfeldt-Jacob & Mad Cow Diseasese
NPR
Special Report: How Safe is the Food Supply?
Certain antibiotics, once considered miracle cures, may no longer be effective because strains of bacteria have become resistant. That's because within every strain of bacteria, a small portion of the population have small but crucial genetic resistance to an antibiotic. And if, for example, a sick person takes antibiotics but fails to finish the whole course of the drug, some of that resistant bacteria can survive. The surviving bacteria stays in the environment, carrying on the genetic resistance, and the process can eventually lead to a strain of the original bacteria that is totally immune to the antibiotic's assault. |
Animal and Wildlife Diseases
|
Climate Change and Health - Malaria, Dengue, West Nile Virus
|
New and Resurgent Diseases Resurgent Cholera, Malaria, Tuberculosis, Ebola and HIV
|
Drug Resistances
|
Biotechnology and Biological Warfare
Dismay over US germ warfare stance
Wednesday, 25 July, 2001, 18:08 GMT 19:08 UK
The BBC's Stephen Sackur in Washington
"The US is under fire for failing to cooperate"
Former US negotiator Elisa Harris
"The US does not want to be encumbered with treaty obligations"
Prof Michael Clarke, Centre for Defence Studies
"It looks as if the US is trying to get out of interdependence agreements"
Biological weapons expert Dr Barbara Rosenberg
"The US is becoming more politically isolated"
There has been dismay at a UN disarmament conference in Geneva as the US turned its back on another international accord, this time one designed to enforce a ban on the use of biological weapons.
Washington's representative said the US was unable to support the draft accord - the result of years of debate - because it would not achieve its goals and would hurt American interests.
Donald Mahley said: "In our assessment, the draft protocol would put national security and confidential business information at risk."
Members of non-governmental organisations sitting in the public gallery shook their heads and called the announcement a "disaster".
Some official delegations also said they regretted the US decision and called for negotiations to continue without Washington.
The germ warfare agreement aims to introduce measures to enforce the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention, which the US says it still supports.Germ warfare talks suspended
Friday, 3 August, 2001, 22:48 GMT 23:48 UK
International negotiations to enforce a global ban on germ warfare have been suspended following a recent decision by the United States to pull out of the talks.
The chairman of the 56-nation talks, Tibor Toth of Hungary, said the group could not go on working on a protocol on enforcement of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention without the participation of the United States.
The germ warfare convention, while outlawing the manufacture, storage or use of toxic weapons, has no mechanism to ensure that states adhere to it.
Washington withdrew from the talks towardsat the end of July, saying it objected to too many clauses on the proposed agreement.
US fears espionage
The US says the draft will be ineffective in stopping countries from developing germ warfare, but will endanger US security and expose the commercial secrets of its biotech industry to industrial espionage.US accused over bio-weapons deal
Sunday, 18 November, 2001, 21:49 GMT
The United States is putting at risk a key United Nations conference on deadly biological weapons which gets under way in Geneva on Monday.
The conference, which is aimed at strengthening the Biological Weapons Convention, will be attended by up to 500 delegates representing up to 144 countries.
A number of British politicians and experts have accused the Americans of dragging their feet following the Bush administration's rejection of a new protocol in July this year.
They say the US could jeopardise moves to bring in a tough new inspection and enforcement regime.
"The danger at Geneva is that there will be an endless flow of recriminations against the United States for what it did in July and August, which will make them even more resistant to coming back on board," warned Nicholas Sims of the London School of Economics in an interview on the BBC's War Report.